| S55
ENGAGING PRACTICE: BARRIERS AND OPPORTUNITIES |
The Engaged Government Project
Oliver PE1, Leibrecht T2*
1. Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane, Queensland,
Australia
2. Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Several practitioners and researchers have identified a change in the
mode of governing in Australia and elsewhere from government to governance.
Features of this change include a shift towards ‘whole of government’
activity; devolution of government business to the region, and a blurring
of the demarcation between state and civil society, potentially providing
citizens with greater opportunity to influence government policy.
The Queensland Departments of Main Roads; Natural Resources and Mines;
and Transport and the Local Government Association of Queensland have
recognised the need to learn how they can improve their understanding
of this change and how it affects policy and practice in these areas.
In 2004, researchers from Central Queensland University; Griffith University;
and University of Queensland, with the support of the Australian Research
Council, commenced a three-year action research study of government-community
engagement for regional outcomes, working in collaboration with the agency
partners, focusing on five case studies in Central Queensland.
This Engaged Government Project involves researchers from three disciplines
– economics, public policy and sociology and aims to examine the
conditions (strategic, structural and procedural) under which multi-sectoral
collaboration can deliver policy coherence and positive regional outcomes,
as well as identifying the costs, benefits, trade-offs and capacities
associated with multi-sectoral collaborations.
This paper provides a window into this work in progress. It highlights
significant learnings from phase one and indicates directions and themes
that will be pursued in the second and final phase of the project. The
collaborative nature of the research itself is also highlighted, as are
key learnings gained from this process.
|